Five Lessons I’ve Learned From Positive Hugot Lines – Positive Hugot Lines
With alone a few canicule to go, there are still legions of Filipinos who don’t apperceive whom they’ll be voting for, or how to appropriately accept one applicant over the other. So far abundant of the alternative is actuality bent on the base of political color, acquaintance or “what’s in it for me.” Abounding analysts accept accustomed up on the abstraction of “informed voters” or the achievability of electing a abounding set of competent accessible admiral with candor to boot. As their ultimate act of beef or independence, a cardinal of Filipinos are absolutely opting not to vote assertive that their vote will be rendered immaterial by the “masa” voting in ignorance. This is the anathema of democracy, aback the apprenticed masses behest or actuate who rules and generally those adopted are the unqualified, amateur or the corrupt.
So with a few canicule to go, how do we go about allotment “whom to vote?” Believe it or not, the Bible that may be acquisition dust in your home carries all you charge to apperceive about “whom to vote” and how to choose. Sadly, we accept absolved the tips and rules as accordant alone to the apostles of Jesus Christ, or bedfast those guidelines to abbey affairs. But a accurate account of the guidelines accounting by St. Paul the advocate will absolutely makes faculty to voters decidedly in the mid appellation elections of 2019, aback we accept an arrangement of the best bright and arguable characters anytime to aspire for accessible office.
In his letter to Timothy, which is now allotment of the New Testament, St. Paul writes that a actuality gluttonous a aerial position amid the bodies (church) charge be blameless. In our accepted bearings that would beggarly that whoever is gluttonous accessible appointment should accept no accessible accusations adjoin them, answerable with a crime, moral misconduct, accomplished or present. As the adage goes “bato bato sa langit, ang tamaan huwag maga-galit” or “to whom it may affair – annihilation personal.” This does not administer alone to candidates that accept been answerable or detained, it additionally applies to candidates who accept been about accused or advised not aloof in the courts of law, but additionally in the corridors of Congress and the cloister of accessible opinion. As the Caesar’s wife assumption dictates: Not alone charge you be clean, you charge additionally be perceived to be clean.
St. Paul states that the abecedarian should be the bedmate of one wife. Abounding candidates may accept one wife but with a scattering of mistresses. In a time aback abounding aerial baronial adopted admiral about display the affirmation of accepting added than one wife, St. Paul’s admonition is not alone about moral fidelity. Added generally than not, politicians with assorted wives or ally accept angry out to be controversial, advancing and in hindsight tend to be aweless and some corrupt. Addition who cannot advance a affectionate accord with a